User Tools

Site Tools


books_of_the_bible_and_their_true_origins

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

books_of_the_bible_and_their_true_origins [2019/03/29 16:22] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Books of the Bible And Their True Origins ======
  
 +Their are many ancient books and writings, the bible closes the mind to that idea. The bible is not historically relevant, many other ancient books such as for example Plutarch are factual.
 +
 +Their is evidence that Greek intellects organized the bible as a tool for establishing legitimacy for the seleucid Plotomy for the area along with the Rosetta stone for Egypt. The dating of the bible and the stories aid this theory.
 +
 +  * Adam And Eve - unknown may have Greek origins, as their are polytheistic and monotheistic versions, Prometheus. Pandora and Epimetheus.
 +  * Cain & Abel - may be of Sumerian origin, Cain as the nomads that destroyed the original inhabitants of Sumeria, the Un-San-Giga,​ or may be Egyptian story of Osiris and Set.
 +  * Great Flood - may be of Sumerian origin preserved by oral tradition
 +  * Exodus, Moses, a plagiarising of Akhenaten experiment at Armana.
 +  * David and Goliath, a plagiarising of Alexander The Great versus The Persian Empire, the real David and Goliath story and this story dates the Jews.
 +  * Jesus and Rabbinic Judaism and general canonism of stories are Roman additions and reforms to the work. The new testament has traditional dietic entities and has Roman stories. Rabbinic Judaism as the only accepted Roman version of the sects.
 +
 +  * The invention of a deity through a story arises "I AM" along with some mesmerizating words that legitimizes and the subsequent books that will order people to hand over their wealth and murder on his behalf. Unknown.
books_of_the_bible_and_their_true_origins.txt ยท Last modified: 2019/03/29 16:22 (external edit)