Overpopulation has always been an elitest world view. When the crux of the problem is Royal oils.
An age old question, why among all the animals does man exist beyond a balance with nature. The problem it seems is that man lives beyond nature's balance rather than being the pride for some it is a problem. For if man lived in balance with nature somehow all his hopes and dreams would be pacified rather than man doing his best to rise out of the hardship of nature. That man exceeds the boundaries of nature is what makes humans better but for some it seems that is the problem.
This philosophical mystery is simply answered that man exists beyond the balance of nature because his promise is to be space faring. There in the challenge of space is man to find a challenge he will not be able to overcome and in that effort a most productive time.
We can choose to believe the overpopulation hype or reject it, even while the Royal oils of this world are the cause of the exhaust fumes changing the composition of the atmosphere and Royal oil based plastics that do not biodegrade and placing that issue with the amount of people on the Earth rather than their business practices,. Royal Dutch Shell, Aramco, the royal families of the world are the ones spewing rubbish into the atmosphere. The crux of the problem is Royal oils.
The basis of the system today is to mine resources, sell them for profit but eventually all of it goes into the rubbish, and at a certain number of population the entire planet becomes rubbish. People do not consider the problems of mass transit and in the end it is a traffic jam, road rage and waiting around for ever without any brain to realize such. Too many people will render the Earth a waste land and a rubbish dump. The process of product creation is in fact the process of rubbish creation with polluted air, water, food and land. The limits must be scientifically proved and implemented, eventually the world either becomes rubbish, or we all agree to move into a smarter way of living.
This page is about a political policy platform for a society to exist in harmony or balance with nature, not using force but by consensus. The options are as follows…
Obviously the ideal option is the first one, but if the world is at stake we cannot let it go to the rubbish.
Today population is predominantly an India, China problem and will become an Africa problem in the next century. In terms of consumption it is a USA problem.
An economy requires a minimum amount of funds in the system to avoid deflation. The society needs to have a certain amount of money circulating and spending a certain amount of money for services to maintain themselves and if they spend more the services can grow bigger. If people have no money they cannot spend any money and the fundamental needs that business provides loses customers and funds.
Today the injection of these funds is squandered to banks and to the international bond market. Now if these two orifices were shut down deflation, recession and depression would soon occur.
Now if the power to inflate the economy was taken away from the banks and the international bond markets and placed instead strictly towards social programs targeting the bottom up then socialism would be funded just by warding off deflation (without taxes).
Now you know that the international bond markets mean that a nation will pay in interest the total annual budget of the nation and banks will put out debt hoping to get enough to pay it back with interest. Such a system is inflationary, high taxing and enslaving. Socialism competes against banks and the bond market and the result is too crowded to be effective.
The government will then have to reign in the banks and end their loan business and pull out of the bond market and then democratically institute social programs and fund those programs as the primary means of injecting funds into the system to ward off deflation.
As the funding of those programs becomes the primary means of accessing funds it will re-order society, business is forced to provide services to the poorest in housing, food, clothing and health care as welfare and health care systems become the first receivers of funds causing the focus to be on the poorest and those that provide services will seek to service the poorest and all will get what they need. The program endows the most needy and the service providers doing services to get paid from them.
Getting enough funds out is clockwork. If the government releases a certain amount of funds in social programs per year a certain standard of living is assured. If it increases it service providers will have a bumper crop and if it retrains aid service providers will have a bad year.
Now international bond holders as well as the banks are not going to like the government being the controller of all release of money and that being strictly socialism and will work to destroy the system because they are the largest benefactors of the current system.
The employment problem. Selected UBI for research. Any person that does research for a living employed by accepted compnay get UBI from the company.
Their is simply too much to gain from working out how to do process better, so the focus on futurism.
The second option, every where their are death and their are births. A nation might average 10,000 deaths and 20,000 births per year. A government will want to either have 40,000 deaths per year and 20,000 birth per year. And will alter the system to achieve such. It is not recommended that people proactively achieve these numbers. If a government stopped trying to save everyones life then it will occur without any action. People do dangerous activites, from smoking to driving badly and so on. Stop making laws that save people's lives.
This solution is not recommended because when people are threatened they breed, and world wars barely buy you 100 years. World War III - the major solution is world war for the side effect purpose to bring populations under control, this WWIII based for China, India to bring their combined population to under or about 250 million each. Technology Until WWIII - put more funding into developing all the technologies to deal with overpopulation for the purpose of a post WWIII world where the technologies will still be valid. For example lab meat, architecture, space hotel, water purification and all the other concepts to invent for the situation.
Their are place in the world where by the policy of government the population has remained steady and their have also been population control failures. This is about adding to the policies that work, while also improving the care available to the myriad of issues humans face. In preference for sanatoriums where exit is based on stability of the candidate, and rather than safe injecting rooms. If the a candidate is chronic homeless and is taken to a sanatorium facility for chronic homeless persons then if they are able to leave the facility and return at night without issue then they are free to come and go, if they seem to have a disposition to sleep on the street when they have a bed allocated in the clean facility then they will not be permitted to leave. This goes the same for public displays of insanity and street beggars. The level of care at the these facilities are important they are not criminal facilities or mental institutions.
For socialism to ever actually work, the government must come clean, transparent about where taxes are going and why deflationary pressures in a socialist system cannot be used to pay for quality care services.